Author summary
0% 13 analyzed articles/videos 17,544 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Neuman results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 7,919 hits . Analysis detected 67,991 faulty-reasoning hits from 60,732 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (4,133 of 6,136 authors). This Scott Neuman is better (less manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group. Scott Neuman
Author details
Total words: 60,732
Article count: 13
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.6% percentile 2.1% BS Score13 analyzed articles60.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.0% 13.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst