NPR84%

The days are hot, but so are the nights. That's a problem, experts say 21%

By Scott Neuman0%

7/2/2026, 4:55:50 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 176 hits. Analysis detected 1,095 faulty-reasoning hits from 619 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.6% and a BS Rank of 21% (16,101 of 20,367 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 79.10% of the article peer group.

Much of the U.S. is in the midst of dangerous and potentially record-breaking daytime temperatures as a heat dome has settled over the Midwest and the Atlantic Coast. 
But nighttime temperatures are staying unusually warm, too, raising the risk of heat exhaustion and heat stroke even higher, especially for people without access to air conditioning. 
"We're seeing temperatures well into the evening that are staying shockingly high and, in some cases, never dropping below 80 or 75 degrees. 
And this is really concerning," according to Ashley Ward, director of the Heat Policy Innovation Hub at Duke University's Nicholas Institute. 
Ward says that climate change is making the trend worse. 
"We're not getting the opportunity for recovery overnight, as we've historically seen," she says. 
"Our bodies need it, of course, but plants and animals  also our energy infrastructure. 
We need to be able to cool off overnight." 
In the Baltimore-D.C. region and southeastern Pennsylvania, including Philadelphia, highs on Thursday were expected to be in the low to mid 100s with heat indices around 110F, according to the National Weather Service forecast. 
Overnight lows are expected to remain in the low 80s for many of those areas. 
Friday's forecast will be much the same. 
Climate change means that each summer we are seeing more heatwaves similar to the current one and also more hot nights. 
The Fifth National Climate Assessment, published three years ago, notes that nighttime temperatures are rising faster than daytime temperatures in the U.S. 
"[T]he number of nights where the temperature never falls below 70°F is increasing everywhere in the US except the Northern Great Plains," it says. 
According to Alex DaSilva, a meteorologist with Accuweather, "The trends have been for those overnight lows to be warmer and warmer and warmer, especially when we're dealing with these big heat wave events." 
The reason? 
The atmosphere is retaining more heat at night, DaSilva says. 
With warmer nights, the daytime temperature rise starts from a hotter floor. 
It's made worse by generally more humid conditions, also attributable to climate change. 
For that reason, those afternoon summer showers may not help, he says. 
"It can even feel worse sometimes after a rain shower or a thunderstorm comes through." 
People "can't evaporate the sweat off of our skin when there's so much water content in the air," Ward says, which can lead to heat stroke or heat exhaustion, she says. 
"It's really a combination of temperature and relative humidity," W. 
Larry Kenney, a professor of physiology and kinesiology at Penn State University, tells NPR's Morning Edition. 
"The sweating response is really only valuable if that sweat can evaporate." 
These temperatures are a concern for anyone exposed to them, but for people without access to air conditioning, the situation is especially dangerous. 
According to the U.S. 
Energy Information Administration, 88% of U.S. households had air conditioning installed as of 2020. 
However, a separate study by KFF  a nonprofit organization focused on health policy, polling, and journalism formerly known as the Kaiser Family Foundation  found that Asian, Black, and Hispanic households were more likely than White households to lack air conditioning. 
The study also found that lower-income households were more likely to be without air conditioning than those with higher incomes. 
The most vulnerable people are older men and women. 
And the problem is compounded by comorbidities such as heart disease and diabetes, Kenney says. 
If you have to be out in the heat, he recommends taking it slowly and getting used to the heat gradually. 
And, of course, staying hydrated. 
"Make sure they drink before their heat exposure and especially afterward to try to catch up." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.1%Scott Neuman: 2.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Confirmation Bias7.1%This article: 1.9%Scott Neuman: 1.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.6%Anchoring Bias1.9%This article: 5.3%Scott Neuman: 5.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.8%Availability Heuristic5.3%This article: 10.0%Scott Neuman: 1.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic10.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 3.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Scott Neuman: 2.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.4%Overconfidence Bias1.5%This article: 3.9%Scott Neuman: 9.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.1%Framing Effect3.9%This article: 10.7%Scott Neuman: 2.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Loss Aversion10.7%This article: 2.3%Scott Neuman: 1.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Status Quo Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.4%Scott Neuman: 2.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Optimism Bias3.4%This article: 1.9%Scott Neuman: 3.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Pessimism Bias1.9%This article: 28.4%Scott Neuman: 13.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.3%Negativity Bias28.4%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 4.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 2.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 1.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 1.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 3.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.1%Scott Neuman: 1.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.7%Recency Bias1.1%This article: 0.8%Scott Neuman: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Primacy Effect0.8%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 2.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 18.3%Scott Neuman: 8.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.1%Appeal to Authority18.3%This article: 3.9%Scott Neuman: 1.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%False Dilemma3.9%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 17.9%Scott Neuman: 4.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 4.4%Hasty Generalization17.9%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.0%Scott Neuman: 5.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.6%Appeal to Emotion5.0%This article: 0.3%Scott Neuman: 0.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Begging the Question0.3%This article: 10.0%Scott Neuman: 3.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.6%Scott Neuman: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.4%Burden of Proof0.6%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.4%Scott Neuman: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Composition/Division2.4%This article: 2.4%Scott Neuman: 4.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Anecdotal2.4%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.6%Scott Neuman: 2.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.6%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 1.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.1%Scott Neuman: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Unattributed Quote8.1%This article: 6.1%Scott Neuman: 0.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection6.1%This article: 7.9%Scott Neuman: 1.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.1%Biased Writer Voice7.9%This article: 12.0%Scott Neuman: 0.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.0%Indoctrination12.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 2.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Neuman: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

619 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers73%attributed speech165writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageAshley Ward • 23 words • 100.0% coverageAshley Ward • 21 words • 0.0% coverageAshley Ward • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAshley Ward • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAshley Ward • 15 words • 0.0% coverageAshley Ward • 9 words • 100.0% coverageNational Weather Service • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageFifth National Climate Assessment • 22 words • 0.0% coverageFifth National Climate Assessment • 24 words • 0.0% coverageAlex DaSilva • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageAlex DaSilva • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAlex DaSilva • 12 words • 0.0% coverageAlex DaSilva • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAlex DaSilva • 12 words • 0.0% coverageAlex DaSilva • 15 words • 100.0% coverageAshley Ward • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageLarry Kenney • 16 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Kenney • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageU.S. Energy Information Administration • 14 words • 0.0% coverageKFF • 42 words • 0.0% coverageKFF • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Kenney • 15 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Kenney • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageLarry Kenney • 16 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ashley Ward

100%flagged-word coverage
123 attributed words27% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Biased Writer Voice-29.7 ptsWriter: 29.7%Ashley Ward: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination+23.0 ptsWriter: 3.0%Ashley Ward: 26.0%26.0%Unattributed Quote+13.7 ptsWriter: 11.5%Ashley Ward: 25.2%25.2%Quote-first Misdirection+18.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Ashley Ward: 18.7%18.7%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.