Gothamist77%

Join us for a live series on what it means to make New York more affordable 69%

By WNYC Staff88%

7/17/2026, 1:06:57 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 61.6% saturation with 277 hits. Analysis detected 971 faulty-reasoning hits from 450 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 61.7% and a BS Rank of 69% (6,977 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 68.10% of the article peer group.

You don’t have to be a political pundit to know that over the past several election cycles, one issue is top of mind for New Yorkers at the ballot box: affordability. 
Voters across lines of income, identity and ideology are deciding elections based on who they believe will make city living more affordable as the costs of housing, food, childcare, transportation and healthcare continue to rise. 
Over the past two years, Gothamist and WNYC reporters have documented what the affordability crisis looks like from nearly every angle  how the loss of SNAP benefits hits families and businesses, how housing costs increase rent and expenses, and what the rising price of childcare means for families and providers. 
Again and again, our reporting has revealed that the people often portrayed as being on opposite sides of these debates frequently face many of the same economic pressures. 
That’s the starting point for “In Conversation: The Affordability Series,” a new five-part community event initiative from WNYC and Gothamist that brings our journalism into neighborhoods across the five boroughs. 
**In Conversation: The Affordability Series** 
**July 21, 2026 at 7 p.m.; Doors open at 6:30 p.m. 
** 
**BEM books & more** 
373 Lewis Ave., Brooklyn, New York 
A conversation on food affordability moderated by "All Things Considered" host Sean Carlson. 
Tune in to "All Things Considered" from July 22 to July 24 to hear some of the conversations. 
Future events will feature discussions on housing affordability in Queens in August, childcare on Staten Island in September, transportation in Manhattan in October and health care in the Bronx in November. 
Rather than staging debates, each event will bring together New Yorkers to discuss the different pressures they face from the rising cost of living in the city. 
WNYC and Gothamist reporters will also speak with policy experts and community advocates to discuss not only where their experiences differ but where they overlap and examine solutions 
The series begins **July 21** at **BEM books & more** in Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn, with a conversation on food affordability moderated by "All Things Considered" host Sean Carlson. 
Doors open at 6:30 p.m., with the program starting at 7 p.m. 
Tune in to "All Things Considered" from July 22 to July 24 to hear some of the conversations. 
Future events will feature discussions on housing affordability in Queens in August, childcare on Staten Island in September, transportation in Manhattan in October, and healthcare in the Bronx in November. 
More information and details on these events to come. 
The events are free and open to the public, however, registration is required. 
To reserve your place, visit wnyc.org/events. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.3%WNYC Staff: 9.6%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias11.3%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%WNYC Staff: 4.6%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic6.9%This article: 14.0%WNYC Staff: 4.7%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic14.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 2.3%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 12.9%WNYC Staff: 6.3%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect12.9%This article: 2.9%WNYC Staff: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion2.9%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.0%WNYC Staff: 0.7%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.9%WNYC Staff: 2.3%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias6.9%This article: 6.0%WNYC Staff: 2.0%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect6.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 32.7%WNYC Staff: 10.9%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority32.7%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 24.4%WNYC Staff: 13.3%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization24.4%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 7.8%WNYC Staff: 4.9%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon7.8%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.8%WNYC Staff: 2.6%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.8%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.0%WNYC Staff: 2.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground6.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 6.7%WNYC Staff: 2.2%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice6.7%This article: 6.0%WNYC Staff: 2.0%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination6.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WNYC Staff: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 61.6%WNYC Staff: 31.3%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…61.6%

450 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers27%attributed speech328writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageGothamist • 51 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWNYC • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageSean Carlson • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWNYC • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Gothamist

100%flagged-word coverage
51 attributed words42% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -62.8 ptsWriter: 62.8%Gothamist: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-8.2 ptsWriter: 8.2%Gothamist: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.