Topic summary
69% 14 analyzed articles/videos 15,224 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Affordability results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 7,735 hits . Analysis detected 61,382 faulty-reasoning hits from 60,828 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (12,268 of 16,104 topics). This Affordability is better (less manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group. Affordability
Topic details
Total words: 60,828
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score14 analyzed articles60.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.7% 12.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst