BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, False Dilemma, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 121 hits. Analysis detected 1,395 faulty-reasoning hits from 565 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of 70% (6,749 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 69.20% of the article peer group.

Gov. 
Greg Abbott is proposing measures to help rein in rising home and car insurance costs for Texas residents. 
Abbott spoke Wednesday following a campaign stop in northwest Houston to meet with residents to discuss their concerns about affordability. 
"Texas has what may be the highest home insurance cost of any state  if not the highest, we are one of the highest," Abbott said. 
Abbott noted that Texas ranks number one in the United States for the most hail damage and the most hail-related home insurance claims. 
Coupled with that, the state suffers an abnormal amount from wind damage, as a result of hurricanes, tropical storms, tornadoes, and other wind-related disasters. 
To address the problem, Abbott proposed adopting a roof fortification plan, following in the footsteps of southeastern coastal states from North Carolina to Louisiana, as well as Kentucky and Oklahoma. 
"Where this has been done, it leads to about an 8% reduction in premiums and, over the life of the roof, savings of about more than $15,000," the governor said. 
"And this is a proven strategy that I say is time that we adopted in Texas to ensure that we are reducing the leading cause of home insurance rates going up." 
RELATED: Houstonians report difficulties paying energy bills, UH Hobby School survey finds 
Abbott also proposed changing Texas law to let insurers take moving violations into consideration when calibrating car insurance costs, with the aim of rewarding drivers for good behavior. 
"In states where that has been done, if you look at what the auto insurers say themselves, it could reduce your auto insurance policy by as much as 30%," Abbott said. 
"So, when you combine this auto insurance reform as well as the home insurance reform, it will lead to at a minimum hundreds of dollars a year, more likely thousands of dollars a year, in savings to homeowners and auto owners in the state of Texas." 
State representative and Democratic gubernatorial candidate Gina Hinojosa's campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 
Hinojosa unveiled her own economic policy initiatives to combat the state's affordability problems in a multi-city tour that began last week. 
Her plan would involve calling on the legislature to use $17 billion of the state's Rainy Day Fund to issue tax refund checks of $1,500 to Texas families. 
RELATD: As Texas lawmakers tackle health care affordability, discussions turn to insurance costs 
Abbott's announcement follows previous campaign statements about addressing affordability through fresh property tax relief bills. 
These would involve a combination of lowering the amount by which property appraisals can increase from 10% a year to 3% every five years; requiring a two-thirds voter approval for property tax increases; and eliminating school property taxes for homeowners, shifting the burden of funding schools entirely to the state. 
"Admittedly,” Abbott said, “this is going to cost about $10 billion. 
If you look at what the Texas budget surplus is right now for each of the past four years, the budget surplus alone would have been enough to pay for that. 
However, we know we can't always bank on that. 
And that's why I'm working  as well as I know the Lieutenant Governor and Speaker are working  on ways in which we can cut state spending in areas that do not involve education." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.0%Andrew Schneider: 2.5%Houston Public Media: 1.7%Confirmation Bias11.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 1.7%Houston Public Media: 1.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Andrew Schneider: 5.0%Houston Public Media: 2.7%Availability Heuristic4.1%This article: 9.6%Andrew Schneider: 2.0%Houston Public Media: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic9.6%This article: 5.5%Andrew Schneider: 0.9%Houston Public Media: 0.5%Hindsight Bias5.5%This article: 10.8%Andrew Schneider: 6.5%Houston Public Media: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias10.8%This article: 14.2%Andrew Schneider: 11.9%Houston Public Media: 4.9%Framing Effect14.2%This article: 8.1%Andrew Schneider: 1.6%Houston Public Media: 0.5%Loss Aversion8.1%This article: 5.3%Andrew Schneider: 0.5%Houston Public Media: 0.5%Status Quo Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 13.6%Andrew Schneider: 4.2%Houston Public Media: 2.3%Optimism Bias13.6%This article: 1.6%Andrew Schneider: 1.1%Houston Public Media: 0.8%Pessimism Bias1.6%This article: 4.6%Andrew Schneider: 5.0%Houston Public Media: 4.7%Negativity Bias4.6%This article: 6.2%Andrew Schneider: 1.2%Houston Public Media: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 1.7%Houston Public Media: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Andrew Schneider: 1.3%Houston Public Media: 1.6%In-Group Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.4%Houston Public Media: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.3%Houston Public Media: 1.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.7%Andrew Schneider: 2.2%Houston Public Media: 1.2%Recency Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 2.7%Houston Public Media: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 20.4%Andrew Schneider: 7.1%Houston Public Media: 3.5%Appeal to Authority20.4%This article: 20.0%Andrew Schneider: 4.0%Houston Public Media: 0.7%False Dilemma20.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 2.7%Houston Public Media: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.1%Andrew Schneider: 6.9%Houston Public Media: 2.0%Hasty Generalization8.1%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 1.1%Houston Public Media: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 5.5%Houston Public Media: 4.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 5.5%Andrew Schneider: 3.2%Houston Public Media: 0.8%Begging the Question5.5%This article: 18.9%Andrew Schneider: 3.2%Houston Public Media: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)18.9%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.8%Houston Public Media: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.4%Houston Public Media: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 5.3%Andrew Schneider: 0.5%Houston Public Media: 0.1%Appeal to Nature5.3%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.5%Andrew Schneider: 3.9%Houston Public Media: 1.3%Anecdotal5.5%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 17.9%Andrew Schneider: 2.5%Houston Public Media: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)17.9%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 5.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.5%Houston Public Media: 0.1%Special Pleading5.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 21.4%Andrew Schneider: 3.0%Houston Public Media: 1.1%Unattributed Quote21.4%This article: 1.9%Andrew Schneider: 1.0%Houston Public Media: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection1.9%This article: 5.5%Andrew Schneider: 1.1%Houston Public Media: 1.1%Biased Writer Voice5.5%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.4%Houston Public Media: 1.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 8.1%Andrew Schneider: 0.8%Houston Public Media: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…8.1%

565 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers70%attributed speech167writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Abbott • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Abbott • 26 words • 100.0% coverageGreg Abbott • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Abbott • 30 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Abbott • 30 words • 100.0% coverageGreg Abbott • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Abbott • 28 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Abbott • 31 words • 100.0% coverageGreg Abbott • 46 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageGina Hinojosa • 21 words • 0.0% coverageGina Hinojosa • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Abbott • 11 words • 100.0% coverageGreg Abbott • 31 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Abbott • 9 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Abbott • 35 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Greg Abbott

100%flagged-word coverage
349 attributed words88% of attributed speech61% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Unattributed Quote+34.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Greg Abbott: 34.7%34.7%Attempt to Sell a Product +13.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Greg Abbott: 13.2%13.2%Biased Writer Voice+8.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Greg Abbott: 8.9%8.9%Quote-first Misdirection+3.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Greg Abbott: 3.2%3.2%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.