Speaker summary
49% 60 analyzed articles/videos 3,804 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg Abbott results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Overconfidence Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 498.161 hits . Analysis detected 6,304.604 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,804 analyzed words across 60 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 1% (26,711 of 26,862 speakers). This Greg Abbott is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group. Greg Abbott
Speaker details
Total words: 3,804
Article count: 60
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.6% percentile 2.8% BS Score60 analyzed videos3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 9.2% 9.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
KTBB 45% 7/21/2026, 3:15:00 AM