Gov. Greg Abbott orders state health agencies to crack down on ‘birth tourism’ 82%

By Andrew Schneider82%

7/21/2026, 8:51:28 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 111 hits. Analysis detected 1,049 faulty-reasoning hits from 477 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 73% and a BS Rank of 82% (4,115 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 81.20% of the article peer group.

Gov. 
Greg Abbott has issued an executive order to crack down on the practice of "birth tourism." 
The move appears to be a response to the recent U.S. 
Supreme Court ruling upholding birthright citizenship, despite efforts by President Donald Trump to restrict it. 
Abbott's order directs six health-focused state agencies to investigate schemes aimed at helping non-citizens travel to the United States illegally for the alleged purposes of giving birth and securing U.S. citizenship for their children. 
"Texas will not tolerate the exploitation of our immigration laws by individuals traveling to the United States illegally or under false pretenses to give birth and secure citizenship for their child," Abbott said. 
"This executive order directs state agencies to investigate birth tourism schemes and hold accountable any provider that facilitates this fraud. 
U.S. citizenship is not for sale, and Texas will put a stop to individuals seeking to profit from birth tourism." 
The nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute estimates that, at most, the number of babies born to tourists visiting the U.S. is less than 30,000 out of more than 3.5 million births per year. 
"There’s nothing in the law that says that somebody can’t come to the United States as a tourist when they’re pregnant," said Julia Gelatt, associate director of the U.S. program at the Migration Policy Institute. 
"We had a member of our World Cup team who was born in the United States just by accident because the airline decided that this soccer player’s mom was too pregnant to get on a plane to go back home, even though that was her intention to go back home and give birth." 
The Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. 
Constitution automatically conveys U.S. citizenship on anyone born in the United States, regardless of the legal status of their parents. 
The U.S. 
Supreme Court, in its final decision of the 2025-2026 term, ruled that President Trump could not limit the practice of birthright citizenship. 
"I think ultimately this is the behavior of a sore loser, someone like Greg Abbott who’s unhappy with the ruling of the Supreme Court," said Austin-based immigration attorney Kate Lincoln-Goldfinch, "and now the state is looking for other ways to enforce something that is entirely legal." 
Lincoln-Goldfinch worries the order could make hospitals wary of treating pregnant immigrants, endangering the lives of mothers and children alike. 
Houston-based immigration attorney Gordon Quan shares her concern, and said that medical practitioners may be forced into the position to determine pregnant women's legal status before they can even offer treatment. 
"You want to make sure that mothers have an opportunity for safe delivery, no matter what their status is, whether they be legal or undocumented," Quan said. 
"I think this endangers mothers who are simply having children in the state of Texas, and there’s no useful purpose." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 2.5%Houston Public Media: 1.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Andrew Schneider: 1.7%Houston Public Media: 1.1%Anchoring Bias2.3%This article: 18.2%Andrew Schneider: 5.0%Houston Public Media: 2.7%Availability Heuristic18.2%This article: 6.7%Andrew Schneider: 2.0%Houston Public Media: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic6.7%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.9%Houston Public Media: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 6.5%Houston Public Media: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 17.4%Andrew Schneider: 11.9%Houston Public Media: 4.9%Framing Effect17.4%This article: 9.9%Andrew Schneider: 1.6%Houston Public Media: 0.5%Loss Aversion9.9%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.5%Houston Public Media: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 4.2%Houston Public Media: 2.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 10.7%Andrew Schneider: 1.1%Houston Public Media: 0.8%Pessimism Bias10.7%This article: 23.3%Andrew Schneider: 5.0%Houston Public Media: 4.7%Negativity Bias23.3%This article: 6.9%Andrew Schneider: 1.2%Houston Public Media: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias6.9%This article: 9.6%Andrew Schneider: 1.7%Houston Public Media: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error9.6%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 1.3%Houston Public Media: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.4%Houston Public Media: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.3%Houston Public Media: 1.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.6%Andrew Schneider: 2.2%Houston Public Media: 1.2%Recency Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Andrew Schneider: 2.7%Houston Public Media: 0.6%Ad Hominem9.6%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.8%Andrew Schneider: 7.1%Houston Public Media: 3.5%Appeal to Authority8.8%This article: 4.2%Andrew Schneider: 4.0%Houston Public Media: 0.7%False Dilemma4.2%This article: 14.9%Andrew Schneider: 2.7%Houston Public Media: 0.3%Slippery Slope14.9%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.9%Andrew Schneider: 6.9%Houston Public Media: 2.0%Hasty Generalization10.9%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 1.1%Houston Public Media: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.2%Andrew Schneider: 5.5%Houston Public Media: 4.5%Appeal to Emotion4.2%This article: 6.9%Andrew Schneider: 3.2%Houston Public Media: 0.8%Begging the Question6.9%This article: 2.3%Andrew Schneider: 3.2%Houston Public Media: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.3%This article: 9.6%Andrew Schneider: 0.8%Houston Public Media: 0.2%Tu Quoque9.6%This article: 4.2%Andrew Schneider: 0.4%Houston Public Media: 0.3%Burden of Proof4.2%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.5%Houston Public Media: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 18.2%Andrew Schneider: 3.9%Houston Public Media: 1.3%Anecdotal18.2%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.5%Andrew Schneider: 2.5%Houston Public Media: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.5%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.5%Houston Public Media: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.1%Andrew Schneider: 3.0%Houston Public Media: 1.1%Unattributed Quote7.1%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 1.0%Houston Public Media: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 2.5%Andrew Schneider: 1.1%Houston Public Media: 1.1%Biased Writer Voice2.5%This article: 4.2%Andrew Schneider: 0.4%Houston Public Media: 1.7%Indoctrination4.2%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Schneider: 0.8%Houston Public Media: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

477 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers56%attributed speech212writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageGreg Abbott • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageJulia Gelatt • 35 words • 0.0% coverageJulia Gelatt • 53 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageKate Lincoln-Goldfinch • 46 words • 0.0% coverageKate Lincoln-Goldfinch • 20 words • 0.0% coverageGordon Quan • 31 words • 0.0% coverageGordon Quan • 27 words • 0.0% coverageGordon Quan • 20 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
66 attributed words25% of attributed speech95% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Unattributed Quote-16.0 ptsWriter: 16.0%Kate Lincoln-Goldfinch: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-9.4 ptsWriter: 9.4%Kate Lincoln-Goldfinch: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-5.7 ptsWriter: 5.7%Kate Lincoln-Goldfinch: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.