Author summary
88%3 analyzed articles/videos565 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Schneider results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 626 hits. Analysis detected 5,112 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,332 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,312 of 6,215 authors). This Andrew Schneider is worse (more manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group.
Andrew Schneider
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
63%Andrew Schneider (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,332
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

63% percentile
025507510062.8% percentile
3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.9%5.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.4%14.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.5%5.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 4.7%4.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 14.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate