Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Texas Governor Greg Abbott results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 277 hits. Analysis detected 1,949 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,431 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Texas Governor Greg Abbott is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Texas Governor Greg Abbott
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,431
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 10.7%10.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 13.5%13.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 19.4%19.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.7%12.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 19.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Tu Quoque: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos