Gothamist76%

More than 8K NYC renters evicted so far this year, as affordability crisis grows 42%

By David Brand72%

7/6/2026, 1:00:50 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Unattributed Quote, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32% saturation with 280 hits. Analysis detected 1,444 faulty-reasoning hits from 876 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (12,309 of 21,175 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 58.10% of the article peer group.

More than 8,000 New York City households were evicted from their apartments in the first half of the year amid a deep affordable housing crisis that has fueled record-high rents citywide. 
City records show New York City marshals completed an average of 1,345 evictions per month from January to June, approaching the rate of removals from the years prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and a temporary halt on evictions. 
The monthly average is a decrease compared to the first six months of last year, when there were 1,514 evictions per month. 
The city data shows 17,791 households were evicted from apartments in New York City in all of 2025  the highest total since 2018. 
That spike in evictions helped fuel a windfall for city marshals, who reported gross income of more than $55 million last year, up from about $37 million each of the prior two years, according to data published by the Department of Investigation. 
The agency oversees city marshals, who earn a fee for evictions, car-booting and debt collection. 
Raysa Rodriguez, the executive director at the organization Citizens’ Committee for Children of New York, said the thousands of evictions reveal the depths of the city’s affordability crisis, and its effect on kids. 
“It speaks to the number of families facing financial insecurity,” Rodriguez said. 
“It means more families with children having to turn to shelter and more families with children living in crowded and doubled-up situations.” 
The Citizens’ Committee for Children conducted its own eviction analysis for its 2026 annual report on financial hardship facing young New Yorkers. 
The report, published in April, found that about 154,000 New York City schoolchildren were homeless for at least some portion of the 2024-2025 school year. 
The organization counted more than 33,600 children living in city shelters and attributed the rise in evictions to a dwindling number of apartments with monthly rents that low- and middle-income households can afford. 
Nearly a third of New York City households spend at least half their income on rent, the report found. 
Rodriguez said the eviction data shows the need to expand rental assistance programs and access to emergency aid to cover arrears. 
“It’s a necessity to protect children,” she said. 
Landlords say they file nonpayment eviction cases because they need rental income to pay their own bills, and because the threat of eviction can compel city agencies to step in with aid. 
After a budgeting standoff, Mayor Zohran Mamdani and the City Council on Monday agreed to create a new housing voucher program that will cover some people facing eviction if they live in a rent-stabilized apartment and qualify based on their income. 
The city typically only issues its existing voucher program, known as CityFHEPS, to people living in homeless shelters. 
Mamdani, like his predecessor Eric Adams, blocked measures meant to open access to the program to people facing eviction. 
CityFHEPS now helps more than 65,000 households pay their rent at a cost that budget watchdogs estimate will grow to $1.7 billion this year. 
The federal government has cut back on its voucher programs, and a $50 million state rental assistance pilot program, created last year, will reach few New York City residents. 
The city Department of Social Services also issues emergency loans called “One-Shot Deals” to tenants facing eviction for nonpayment, but only approved about a quarter of applicants last year, according to city data. 
Mamdani’s new housing plan includes other strategies to prevent evictions, like issuing emergency assistance more quickly and increasing funds for the city’s right to counsel program, which is supposed to guarantee an attorney to any low-income tenant in Housing Court. 
"Evictions are traumatic and destabilizing events,” said City Hall spokesperson Casey Berkovitz in a written statement. 
“We are working to provide the support that New Yorkers need in challenging circumstances, whether that is proactively preventing cases from reaching eviction filings, ensuring New Yorkers have access to legal counsel, or working to improve Housing Court with our partners at the Office of Court Administration.” 
An online research tool from the policy group Eviction Lab finds New York City property owners filed 112,000 eviction cases over the past year, accounting for about 5% of renter households in the city overall. 
The steady rate of evictions over the past two years comes even as a heavy backlog of cases and some bureaucratic protections for tenants prolong the legal process. 
Tenants can only be lawfully evicted after a judge orders their removal and issues a warrant. 
Landlords have sued the state court system to hasten the process. 
The lawsuit is now before the New York Court of Appeals. 
Attorney Nativ Winiarsky represents the firms that filed the lawsuit, a collection of limited liability companies connected to the LeFrak Organization, a large property owner. 
He said housing court cases take about a year on average from start to finish, a period in which the amount of unpaid rent can increase to tens of thousands of dollars. 
Those additional costs make it less likely the city will agree to provide a one-shot deal to help keep someone in their apartment and “the tenant is more likely to be evicted because of the delay,” he said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.6%David Brand: 1.9%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias4.6%This article: 5.3%David Brand: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias5.3%This article: 11.8%David Brand: 2.9%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic11.8%This article: 2.2%David Brand: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic2.2%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%David Brand: 9.0%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect1.6%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.7%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.7%David Brand: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.9%David Brand: 4.3%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias9.9%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 32.0%David Brand: 7.7%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias32.0%This article: 3.7%David Brand: 3.4%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias3.7%This article: 1.7%David Brand: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error1.7%This article: 1.3%David Brand: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 1.8%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%David Brand: 0.7%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 1.7%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.7%David Brand: 1.8%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias2.7%This article: 4.9%David Brand: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect4.9%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 1.4%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.0%David Brand: 3.3%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority4.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.9%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.7%David Brand: 3.3%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization6.7%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.6%David Brand: 5.8%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion6.6%This article: 2.4%David Brand: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question2.4%This article: 16.4%David Brand: 2.5%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)16.4%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 1.4%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.9%David Brand: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.9%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.2%David Brand: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground3.2%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 13.8%David Brand: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote13.8%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.0%David Brand: 4.1%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice7.0%This article: 7.8%David Brand: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination7.8%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 1.4%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Brand: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

876 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers32%attributed speech592writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageRaysa Rodriguez • 33 words • 0.0% coverageRaysa Rodriguez • 12 words • 100.0% coverageRaysa Rodriguez • 22 words • 0.0% coverageCitizens’ Committee for Children of New York • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageCitizens’ Committee for Children of New York • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageRaysa Rodriguez • 21 words • 100.0% coverageRaysa Rodriguez • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageCasey Berkovitz • 16 words • 0.0% coverageCasey Berkovitz • 47 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageNativ Winiarsky • 32 words • 0.0% coverageNativ Winiarsky • 38 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Casey Berkovitz

100%flagged-word coverage
63 attributed words22% of attributed speech95% writer coverage
0%37.5%75.0%Indoctrination+74.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Casey Berkovitz: 74.6%74.6%Biased Writer Voice+72.2 ptsWriter: 2.4%Casey Berkovitz: 74.6%74.6%Unattributed Quote-10.6 ptsWriter: 10.6%Casey Berkovitz: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.