Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 5,383 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luke Tsai results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.9% saturation with 8,601 hits . Analysis detected 26,968 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,532 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,871 of 6,590 authors). This Luke Tsai is worse (more manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group. Luke Tsai
Author details
Total words: 21,532
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.4% percentile 2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles21.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 40.0% 40.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 12.7% 12.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 40.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 12.7%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.9%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.9%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst