Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,202 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Briana Loewinsohn results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Halo Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37.9% saturation with 1,822 hits . Analysis detected 7,052 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,808 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,343 of 6,360 authors). This Briana Loewinsohn is worse (more manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group. Briana Loewinsohn
Author details
Total words: 4,808
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.9% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 37.9% 37.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 9.6% 9.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 13.7% 13.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.9% 11.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 37.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 13.7%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Author 11.9%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.8%, sitewide 8.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 9.6%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst