Author summary
25%4 analyzed articles/videos2,066 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Wiley results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 1,234 hits. Analysis detected 11,564 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,112 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 23% (4,941 of 6,365 authors). This Hannah Wiley is better (less manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
Hannah Wiley
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
23%Hannah Wiley (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 15,112
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

22% percentile
025507510022.4% percentile
1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.5%2.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate