Author summary
11%3 analyzed articles/videos512 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonah Owen Lamb results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 663 hits. Analysis detected 4,304 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,984 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,467 of 6,170 authors). This Jonah Owen Lamb is better (less manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group.
Jonah Owen Lamb
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
28%Jonah Owen Lamb (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,984
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

28% percentile
025507510027.6% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate