Author summary
75%4 analyzed articles/videos2,031 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jordan Boyd results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Indoctrination, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 1,720 hits. Analysis detected 16,208 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,465 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 74% (1,735 of 6,604 authors). This Jordan Boyd is worse (more manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group.
Jordan Boyd
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
74%Jordan Boyd (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,465
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

74% percentile
025507510073.7% percentile
3.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.0%10.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 14.0%14.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 18.2%18.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 13.2%13.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.3%10.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 5.6%5.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 12.0%12.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.8%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Author 14.0%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 13.2%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Author 12.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate