Topic summary
35% 14 analyzed articles/videos 7,989 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Film Analysis results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 7,591 hits . Analysis detected 49,831 faulty-reasoning hits from 51,095 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (12,868 of 15,650 topics). This Film Analysis is better (less manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group. Film Analysis
Topic details
Total words: 51,095
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.8% percentile 1.8% BS Score14 analyzed articles51.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.9% 14.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst