Author summary
73% 2 analyzed articles/videos 774 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Hill results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.1% saturation with 1,922 hits . Analysis detected 9,188 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,386 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,019 of 6,359 authors). This Mark Hill is worse (more manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group. Mark Hill
Author details
Total words: 6,386
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.3% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 30.1% 30.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 30.1%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 21.9%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst