Author summary
37% 2 analyzed articles/videos 618 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sean Woods results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 955 hits . Analysis detected 5,560 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,914 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,690 of 6,316 authors). This Sean Woods is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group. Sean Woods
Author details
Total words: 4,914
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.4% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.4% 19.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst