Topic summary
69%13 analyzed articles/videos8,240 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Feminism results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 6,622 hits. Analysis detected 60,350 faulty-reasoning hits from 50,219 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (11,151 of 16,562 topics). This Feminism is better (less manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.7% percentile
2.3% BS Score13 analyzed articles50.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.4%8.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.2%13.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate