Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,097 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Timothy P. Carney results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 952 hits. Analysis detected 5,279 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,183 of 6,354 authors). This Timothy P. Carney is worse (more manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group.
Timothy P. Carney
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
66%Timothy P. Carney (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,388
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

66% percentile
025507510065.7% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.1%8.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 21.7%21.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.8%10.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.6%10.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Author 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 21.7%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 7.5%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Genetic Fallacy: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos