Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,558 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ashley Frawley results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 1,644 hits. Analysis detected 12,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,344 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 74% (1,667 of 6,359 authors). This Ashley Frawley is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Ashley Frawley
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
74%Ashley Frawley (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,344
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

74% percentile
025507510073.8% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.6%10.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 22.4%22.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 17.3%17.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.5%5.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 12.6%12.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.9%14.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.6%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 22.4%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Author 14.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.2%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos