Author summary
47% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,606 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deanne Stillman results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Availability Heuristic , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 1,800 hits . Analysis detected 19,698 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,943 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (3,778 of 6,171 authors). This Deanne Stillman is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group. Deanne Stillman
Author details
Total words: 19,943
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles19.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.8% 3.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.6% 8.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.6%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst