Topic summary
83% 8 analyzed articles/videos 2,989 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Outlook results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 2,221 hits . Analysis detected 18,269 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,569 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (8,674 of 16,562 topics). This Economic Outlook is better (less manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group. Economic Outlook
Topic details
Total words: 14,569
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.6% percentile 2.8% BS Score8 analyzed articles14.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 15.2% 15.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst