Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 856 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Ackerman results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 562 hits . Analysis detected 4,027 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,692 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,857 of 6,263 authors). This Andrew Ackerman is worse (more manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group. Andrew Ackerman
Author details
Total words: 3,692
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.4% percentile 3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 15.2% 15.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.1% 12.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 15.2%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst