BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 89 hits. Analysis detected 752 faulty-reasoning hits from 563 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 58.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (7,967 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 63.60% of the article peer group.

The sun was shining on the Fed chairman, Kevin Warsh, today as he gave his first Congressional monetary report on a day when the consumer price index unexpectedly fell for the first time in six years. 
And that takes a near-term Fed rate hike off the table. 
As Mr. 
Warsh said, it’s too soon to declare "mission accomplished," but he vowed to defeat inflation and get monetary policy right during his appearance before the House Financial Services Committee. 
As he put it: "The 63 months of inflation above target has been an unfair burden. 
It has been a tax on the American people and businesses. 
We plan on getting rid of that tax if that means we need a regime change in policy and we need new consideration of practices, some of which have been working, some of which haven’t, that’s what we aim to do" 
The new Fed chairman has been in office only two months, but energy, precious metals, and farm commodity prices have already started trending lower. 
Mr. 
Warsh intends to be a reformer at the central bank, and has commissioned a number of high-level task forces that will report later in the year on "regime change," as he puts it. 
Yet one thing he understands better than his predecessor is that inflation is a monetary policy issue caused by bad choices and a lack of resolve to restore price stability and presumably restore the 2 percent target. 
Futures markets took at least one Fed rate hike off the table after the benign CPI report. 
There’s still another rate hike priced in perhaps some time this autumn, but I doubt it. 
When you look at the core numbers excluding food and energy, which is what many Fed officials are focused on, the monthly numbers are coming down steadily, and even the 12-month change is only 2.6 percent. 
The topline number for all items was lower in May than in April, and in June it actually fell by four-tenths of one percent. 
Of course energy overall and gasoline in particular drove the index down. 
But it’s also noteworthy that goods prices have been nearly flat for a year, excluding food and energy. 
The much-heralded tariff inflation which would have shown up in goods prices really never came to pass, or if it did, was only momentarily. 
Meanwhile the topline also dropped by 1.1 percent in June. 
Services were flat in June. 
New and used car prices were down. 
And Mr. 
Warsh is right to tell the public that the job of price stability is not yet complete. 
Yet he also knows that when he credibly gets back to 2 percent or less inflation, then interest rates will come down of their own weight and they will stay down. 
What’s more, he painted an optimistic picture of the economy with particular reference to booming business investment. 
In other words, he again is arguing that you can have strong economic growth with low inflation. 
And he stuck to his guns on the positive impact of all manner of advanced tech investment, from AI through quantum computing, space, and who knows what else. 
You know what? 
When you listen to Mr. 
Warsh and see what the early results are  even a Fed chairman can have his cake and eat it too. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.4%Larry Kudlow: 13.9%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Confirmation Bias9.4%This article: 2.1%Larry Kudlow: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 3.4%Anchoring Bias2.1%This article: 3.0%Larry Kudlow: 2.8%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Availability Heuristic3.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 1.3%FoxBusiness: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Larry Kudlow: 7.5%FoxBusiness: 3.7%Overconfidence Bias2.8%This article: 2.1%Larry Kudlow: 6.6%FoxBusiness: 12.9%Framing Effect2.1%This article: 2.0%Larry Kudlow: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 1.5%Loss Aversion2.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 15.8%Larry Kudlow: 9.0%FoxBusiness: 8.8%Optimism Bias15.8%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 2.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Larry Kudlow: 6.7%FoxBusiness: 7.9%Negativity Bias7.1%This article: 6.6%Larry Kudlow: 3.2%FoxBusiness: 4.5%Self-Serving Bias6.6%This article: 6.6%Larry Kudlow: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error6.6%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 6.0%FoxBusiness: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 4.3%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 11.5%Larry Kudlow: 5.6%FoxBusiness: 3.8%Halo Effect11.5%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 0.6%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.0%Larry Kudlow: 2.0%FoxBusiness: 2.3%Recency Bias8.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 0.6%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 4.5%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 2.2%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 2.7%FoxBusiness: 7.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 7.3%Larry Kudlow: 3.0%FoxBusiness: 1.6%False Dilemma7.3%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 12.3%Larry Kudlow: 14.2%FoxBusiness: 6.3%Hasty Generalization12.3%This article: 2.1%Larry Kudlow: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Red Herring2.1%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 6.0%FoxBusiness: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 5.5%Larry Kudlow: 2.2%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Begging the Question5.5%This article: 5.0%Larry Kudlow: 9.0%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 1.7%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.0%Larry Kudlow: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 2.4%Anecdotal5.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.0%Larry Kudlow: 1.9%FoxBusiness: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.2%Larry Kudlow: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 1.8%Unattributed Quote5.2%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 12.3%Larry Kudlow: 18.5%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice12.3%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 4.6%FoxBusiness: 1.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 11.9%FoxBusiness: 2.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Larry Kudlow: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

563 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers25%attributed speech421writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
LARRY KUDLOW • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Warsh • 29 words • 100.0% coverageKevin Warsh • 16 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Warsh • 11 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Warsh • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Warsh • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Kevin Warsh

100%flagged-word coverage
130 attributed words92% of attributed speech78% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Biased Writer Voice+16.8 ptsWriter: 8.6%Kevin Warsh: 25.4%25.4%Unattributed Quote+22.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Kevin Warsh: 22.3%22.3%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.