Keyword summary
88%6 analyzed articles/videos2,188 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Growth results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 1,952 hits. Analysis detected 18,705 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,440 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 63% (13,341 of 35,712 keywords). This Economic Growth is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group.
Economic Growth
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
63%Economic Growth (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

63% percentile
025507510062.6% percentile
3.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.1%17.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 11.3%11.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 9.0%9.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Horn Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate