Author summary
76% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,338 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Monica Potts results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 1,955 hits . Analysis detected 12,719 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,324 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,540 of 6,628 authors). This Monica Potts is worse (more manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group. Monica Potts
Author details
Total words: 9,324
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.7% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 21.0% 21.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.0%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.9%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst