Keyword summary
74% 71 analyzed articles/videos 40,521 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Reserve results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 19,463 hits . Analysis detected 208,660 faulty-reasoning hits from 214,702 analyzed words across 71 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (29,505 of 35,675 keywords). This Federal Reserve is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group. Federal Reserve
Keyword details
Total words: 214,702
Article count: 71
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score71 analyzed articles214.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst