Author summary
ā 16% 1 analyzed article/video 657 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gaya Gupta results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Framing Effect , and Overconfidence Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 342 hits . Analysis detected 1,733 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ā 62% (2,373 of 6,228 authors). This Gaya Gupta is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group. Gaya Gupta
Author details
Total words: 2,628
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.9% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 13.0% 13.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 9.0% 9.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Author 13.0%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.0%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst