Author summary
66% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,652 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Brady results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 1,139 hits . Analysis detected 8,512 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,289 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,872 of 6,629 authors). This David Brady is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group. David Brady
Author details
Total words: 7,289
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.7% percentile 2.8% BS Score7 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.6% 15.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.1% 13.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 9.0% 9.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.0%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst