Topic summary
⁠55%4 analyzed articles/videos1,834 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Reserve Policy results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 897 hits. Analysis detected 6,648 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,821 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,936 of 16,562 topics). This Federal Reserve Policy is better (less manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
Federal Reserve Policy
Topic details
Total words: 6,821
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510046.0% percentile
2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.2%13.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.5%8.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.3%10.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.9%6.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.6%3.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos