Keyword summary
30% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,737 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Monetary Policy results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 1,163 hits . Analysis detected 12,343 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,492 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (30,984 of 35,624 keywords). This Monetary Policy is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group. Monetary Policy
Keyword details
Total words: 18,492
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles18.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst