Keyword summary
30%7 analyzed articles/videos1,737 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Monetary Policy results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 1,163 hits. Analysis detected 12,343 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,492 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (30,984 of 35,624 keywords). This Monetary Policy is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.
Monetary Policy
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
13%Monetary Policy (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

13% percentile
025507510013.0% percentile
1.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles18.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate