Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,738 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Wiseman results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 3,159 hits . Analysis detected 17,063 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,416 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 12% (5,594 of 6,348 authors). This Paul Wiseman is better (less manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group. Paul Wiseman
Author details
Total words: 25,416
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.9% percentile 1.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles25.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.4% 12.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst