Keyword summary
54% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,123 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tech Investment results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 440 hits . Analysis detected 4,269 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,492 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 53% (17,916 of 37,536 keywords). This Tech Investment is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group. Tech Investment
Keyword details
Total words: 4,492
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.3% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst