CNBC⁠54%

CNBC Fed Survey ⁠51%

By Steve Liesman⁠0%

1/8/2018, 1:06:29 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 93.9% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 138 faulty-reasoning hits from 49 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (10,909 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the article peer group.

The CNBC Fed Survey is a quarterly poll of top money managers, strategists and economists that gauges their views on the Federal Reserve and the markets. 
Find out what they think about the Federal Reserve and the markets, in the latest edition of CNBC's Fed Survey. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 4.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 1.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 53.1%Steve Liesman: 6.3%CNBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic53.1%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 2.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 40.8%Steve Liesman: 4.9%CNBC: 6.5%Framing Effect40.8%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.8%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 7.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 2.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 6.4%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 2.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 4.9%CNBC: 5.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 4.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 2.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 1.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 2.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 53.1%Steve Liesman: 11.2%CNBC: 3.7%Biased Writer Voice53.1%This article: 40.8%Steve Liesman: 21.8%CNBC: 0.9%Indoctrination40.8%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Liesman: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 93.9%Steve Liesman: 39.3%CNBC: 5.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…93.9%

49 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers59%attributed speech20writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
CNBC Fed Survey • 3 words • 0.0% coverageCNBC • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

CNBC

100%flagged-word coverage
26 attributed words90% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%CNBC: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination-100.0 ptsWriter: 100.0%CNBC: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +0.0 ptsWriter: 100.0%CNBC: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.