Topic summary
41% 34 analyzed articles/videos 25,232 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Reserve results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 10,729 hits . Analysis detected 98,947 faulty-reasoning hits from 122,708 analyzed words across 34 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (14,271 of 15,539 topics). This Federal Reserve is better (less manipulative) than 91.80% of the peer group. Federal Reserve
Topic details
Total words: 122,708
Article count: 34
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.2% percentile 1.5% BS Score34 analyzed articles122.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst