ZeroHedge⁠70%

Trump-TeThehran Tensions Spike Oil; Waller Whacks Bonds & Bullion; Semis Slammed Amid AI Angst ⁠78%

By Tyler Durden⁠61%

7/13/2026, 8:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 86.4% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 464 faulty-reasoning hits from 81 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 69.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (4,701 of 21,180 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 77.80% of the article peer group.

Tl;dr: Three familiar themes dominated price action today... 
A dramatic escalation of tensions between Trump and Tehran spiked oil prices (and bond yields and the dollar) while growing anxiety over AI CapEx (hyperscaler debt scares) triggered trauma in Semis and the rest of the AI complex (MegaCap tech stable though). 
Fed's Waller went full hawk-tard (Warsh testifies tomorrow) and Bitcoin and bullion were battered. 
* * * 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 51.9%Tyler Durden: 7.5%ZeroHedge: 7.6%Confirmation Bias51.9%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.6%ZeroHedge: 1.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 34.6%Tyler Durden: 4.5%ZeroHedge: 4.5%Availability Heuristic34.6%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.1%ZeroHedge: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.3%ZeroHedge: 1.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.9%ZeroHedge: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 69.1%Tyler Durden: 10.8%ZeroHedge: 10.8%Framing Effect69.1%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.5%ZeroHedge: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.1%ZeroHedge: 2.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 3.7%ZeroHedge: 3.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 86.4%Tyler Durden: 11.1%ZeroHedge: 11.1%Negativity Bias86.4%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.4%ZeroHedge: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.1%ZeroHedge: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.2%ZeroHedge: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.9%ZeroHedge: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.8%ZeroHedge: 0.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 3.2%ZeroHedge: 3.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 9.9%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Primacy Effect9.9%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.3%ZeroHedge: 1.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.5%ZeroHedge: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 17.3%Tyler Durden: 6.4%ZeroHedge: 6.4%Appeal to Authority17.3%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.2%ZeroHedge: 2.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.4%ZeroHedge: 2.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.3%ZeroHedge: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.9%Tyler Durden: 6.6%ZeroHedge: 6.7%Hasty Generalization9.9%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.7%ZeroHedge: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 69.1%Tyler Durden: 5.1%ZeroHedge: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion69.1%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.5%ZeroHedge: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 69.1%Tyler Durden: 5.4%ZeroHedge: 5.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)69.1%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.3%ZeroHedge: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.7%ZeroHedge: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.2%ZeroHedge: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 69.1%Tyler Durden: 2.7%ZeroHedge: 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)69.1%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.2%ZeroHedge: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 4.1%ZeroHedge: 4.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.9%ZeroHedge: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 86.4%Tyler Durden: 10.6%ZeroHedge: 10.6%Biased Writer Voice86.4%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.4%ZeroHedge: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.5%ZeroHedge: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.7%ZeroHedge: 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.9%ZeroHedge: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

81 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.