Topic summary
⁠67%3 analyzed articles/videos455 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bitcoin results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Sunk Cost Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 349 hits. Analysis detected 3,273 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,188 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,146 of 16,413 topics). This Bitcoin is worse (more manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group.
Bitcoin
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,188
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510056.5% percentile
3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 10.9%10.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 9.5%9.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 0.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos