Author summary
67% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,529 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eleanor Pringle results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 2,044 hits . Analysis detected 15,190 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,308 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,357 of 6,228 authors). This Eleanor Pringle is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group. Eleanor Pringle
Author details
Total words: 17,308
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.0% percentile 2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles17.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.8% 11.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 8.0% 8.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 11.8%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst