Topic summary
66% 30 analyzed articles/videos 15,722 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Monetary Policy results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 5,115 hits . Analysis detected 63,026 faulty-reasoning hits from 82,219 analyzed words across 30 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (14,980 of 16,412 topics). This Monetary Policy is better (less manipulative) than 91.30% of the peer group. Monetary Policy
Topic details
Total words: 82,219
Article count: 30
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.7% percentile 1.5% BS Score30 analyzed articles82.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst