Topic summary
65% 17 analyzed articles/videos 14,913 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Responsibility results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 7,355 hits . Analysis detected 68,795 faulty-reasoning hits from 68,121 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (12,262 of 15,435 topics). This Corporate Responsibility is better (less manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group. Corporate Responsibility
Topic details
Total words: 68,121
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score17 analyzed articles68.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst