Author summary
80% 1 analyzed article/video 2,495 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachana Pradhan results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 908 hits . Analysis detected 6,646 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,485 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 43% (3,819 of 6,628 authors). This Rachana Pradhan is better (less manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group. Rachana Pradhan
Author details
Total words: 7,485
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.1% 12.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.8% 10.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.2% 4.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 11.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst