Author summary
43% 1 analyzed article/video 1,719 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aimee Gabay results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 519 hits . Analysis detected 3,728 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,157 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (4,000 of 6,348 authors). This Aimee Gabay is better (less manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group. Aimee Gabay
Author details
Total words: 5,157
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst