Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video809 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Riley Moore results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Indoctrination, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 34.4% saturation with 2,242 hits. Analysis detected 15,872 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,520 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 86% (880 of 6,261 authors). This Riley Moore is worse (more manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group.
Riley Moore
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
86%Riley Moore (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,520
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

86% percentile
025507510086.0% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 34.4%34.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.8%4.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 17.9%17.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 20.2%20.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 19.9%19.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 12.6%12.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.9%8.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 9.0%9.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 13.5%13.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 34.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 19.9%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Author 14.2%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Author 17.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Author 13.5%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 12.9%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 12.6%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Author 9.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 7.5%, sitewide 2.7%Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Tu Quoque: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.2%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos