Topic summary
80% 75 analyzed articles/videos 53,931 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Civil Rights results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 28,828 hits . Analysis detected 281,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 272,207 analyzed words across 74 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (13,217 of 16,562 topics). This Civil Rights is better (less manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group. Civil Rights
Topic details
Total words: 272,207
Article count: 74
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score74 analyzed articles272.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
KTVU 61% 7/21/2026, 2:16:24 AM