Topic summary
60% 18 analyzed articles/videos 12,336 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celebrity Weddings results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 7,657 hits . Analysis detected 49,263 faulty-reasoning hits from 54,560 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (12,827 of 15,607 topics). This Celebrity Weddings is better (less manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group. Celebrity Weddings
Topic details
Total words: 54,560
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.8% percentile 1.8% BS Score18 analyzed articles54.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.0% 14.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst