Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heather Schwedel results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 47.9% saturation with 2,155 hits . Analysis detected 7,369 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,491 of 6,342 authors). This Heather Schwedel is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group. Heather Schwedel
Author details
Total words: 4,500
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.5% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 47.9% 47.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.8% 12.8% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 6.8% 6.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Author 47.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.8%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst