Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video227 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jenna Lemoncelli results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 141 hits. Analysis detected 898 faulty-reasoning hits from 908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (845 of 6,348 authors). This Jenna Lemoncelli is worse (more manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group.
Jenna Lemoncelli
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠87%Jenna Lemoncelli (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 908
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

87% percentile
025507510086.7% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles908 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 15.5%15.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 15.5%15.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 10.8%10.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 12.6%12.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 5.0%5.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 5.7%5.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 15.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.5%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 12.6%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 10.8%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos