Author summary
0% 13 analyzed articles/videos 5,975 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ashleigh Gray results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 3,248 hits . Analysis detected 22,073 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,778 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,291 of 6,363 authors). This Ashleigh Gray is better (less manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group. Ashleigh Gray
Author details
Total words: 30,778
Article count: 13
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.9% percentile 1.6% BS Score13 analyzed articles30.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 10.6% 10.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.6%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst