Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 500 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erin Donnelly results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 553 hits . Analysis detected 1,827 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,000 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,735 of 6,342 authors). This Erin Donnelly is worse (more manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group. Erin Donnelly
Author details
Total words: 2,000
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.7% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 27.6% 27.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 12.6% 12.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 27.6%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 12.6%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Circular Reasoning: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.1% Primacy Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst